Poor J. Jonah Jameson. For so long he's held such a passionate grudge against Spider-Man's vigilantism and has employed every means in his power as editor of The Daily Bugle to slander and whittle Spidey's popularity away from the public's eye. It's worked with mix results. But now, Jameson has just landed a position of power as the mayor of New York City. And that means things are going to be different. He has the political and budgetary power to take out Spider-Man through a variety of new methods. He's going to make life really rough on our web-crawler.
Except things are sort of the same.
You see, Jameson's first order of business was to use government funds to secure a special operative task force with the sole purpose of hunting Spider-Man 'round the clock. Aside from Spidey's quip about spending all this money in such a financial climate (Ecocomics Recession Watch!), there is a larger problem: it's not working the way Jameson had intended. His master plan is to either catch Spider-Man or force him into hiding, which would ensure him victory over New York and earn him respect for being a "no-nonsense, law-and-order, zero-tolerance arachnid" politician.
The problem with this plan is twofold. First of all, governments are generally lousy at catching superheroes. Many times in the comic book world have such task forces and organizations been created and it seems like they consistently get nothing done, while draining the economy's resources for high-tech surveillance gadgets. But the more interesting problem is that Jameson's actions are actually having a strange, adverse effect: rather than forcing Spidey into hiding, he actually decided to don the suit and fight crime 24/7, foregoing his Peter Parker persona. Jameson has actually increased Spider-Man's popularity.
I think that if Jameson really wants to beat Spider-Man, it's about time that he uses his newfound power and influence in a more creative way: economics.
Despite the fact that Spider-Man battles with an array of supervillains, most of his duties involve taking out regular crimes -- robberies, street thugs, gang violence, etc. This is what he is seen doing during Mark Waid's "24/7" story arc. And this sort of crime is currently running rampant in New York (at least in the Marvel Universe). But other things running rampant as well: poverty, uninsurance rates, health care and education costs, etc. These are factors that are known to contribute reductions in crime. A strong economy, for instance, is shown to have reduced the incidence of nonviolent crime (the kind with financial incentives--burglary, robbery, etc.). This paper from the Quarterly Journal of Economics shows that providing families with opportunities to move to lower-poverty neighborhoods significantly reduces juvenile violent crime. This article from The Washington Post describes investment in social programs' effect on reduction of gang violence.
Admittedly, a strong economy does not explain the whole story and there is plenty of evidence to suggest other factors in crime reduction (see Freakonomics, which argues that the legalization of Roe v. Wade in the 70s has played a large role in the reduction of crime rates in the 90s). Yet, Jameson should consider taking the money that he is spending on police forces, especially this anti-Spidey-squad, and funneling it towards anti-poverty measures, health care, education, job training, etc. This way, he accomplishes two things. First, he actually has a chance of achieving the reduction in crime that he preached in his campaign. This would win him the favor of the public. Second, he slowly but surely diminishes the need for Spider-Man, correcting the 24/7 plot that he accidently instigated and reducing Spidey's influence on the city. In this way, Jameson could demonstrate his considerable prowess and show to the people of New York that he is more effective than Spider-Man. Oh yeah, and it could also help reduce poverty, insure more people and help with education. Those things are nice too.
Economics: it might take a while and it might backfire, but it is certainly an idea that Jameson should try out if he's serious about finally nabbing that pesky arachnid.
Clearly though, Jameson's goal is to catch Spiderman for his own personal gratification, rather than actual improvement of the city and betterment of the general population. Thus the goal is not actually helping the city, but to physically detain spiderman, which can indeed only be done by spending lots of money on technology and personnel (labor and kapital) capable of catching spiderman.
ReplyDeleteThis is a pretty good example of the principal-agent problem in politics. Jameson has no real incentive not to use public money for his own personal vendettas. There is the threat of not being re-elected, but due to a combination of informational asymmetry, delayed effects from bad policy, and voter apathy, it's unlikely that he will experience negative effects from his decisions. After all, pouring the GDP of New York City into catching Spiderman certainly looks like something concrete is being done about crime.
The problem I always have with the "Law and Order" argument from candidates, is that it's not really in their interests to do anything significant about the atmosphere that causes crime (Poverty, Education etc...).
ReplyDeleteThere's that truism that for every dollar you spend on education you save 10 on incarceration & police, but law and order types always want to simply pass harsher laws.
Markp -- that's not necessarily the case. Sure Jameson takes a perverse pleasure from watching Spider-Man suffer, but I believe that he really feels that webhead is a menace to society. He's delusional, but that does not make it an entirely personal vendetta. It's similar to some representations of Lex Luthor. He distrusts having an alien with godlike powers living amongst humans.
ReplyDeleteOr he could just give New Yorkers back their Second Amendment rights.... Every state, county, city or community that has rolled back gun legislation has seen a corresponding dramatic DROP in violent crime (criminals tend to be leery of robbing or raping someone who might SHOOT them. Source: "More Guns, Less Crime", 2nd ed.)
ReplyDeleteI am thoroughly convinced in this said post. I am currently searching for ways in which I could enhance my knowledge in this said topic you have posted here. It does help me a lot knowing that you have shared this information here freely. I love the way the people here interact and shared their opinions too. I would love to track your future posts pertaining to the said topic we are able to read.
ReplyDeleteYour article is write very well, I like it very much ~ I wish you have a wonderful day!Thank you.
ReplyDeleteDaniel, yea I can see what you probably did there. I really appreciated that part, however hehe I am not that harsh like my dad with these things. He at all times tells me crazy stories again in the day and calls me a loser. I guess it's time I move out of my dad and mom' basement LOL. Aaanyways, what about you? what does your dad think xD" Anyway, in my language, there are usually not a lot good source like this.
ReplyDeleteGreat write-up, I am a big believer in commenting on blogs to help the weblog writers know that they?ve added something worthwhile to the world wide web! (source roblox-cheats.com). Anyway, in my language, there should not much good supply like this.
ReplyDeleteResources just like the one you mentioned right here shall be very useful to me! I'll submit a link to this web page on my blog. I'm certain my visitors will discover that very useful. Big thanks for the useful info i discovered on Area News Anyway, in my language, there are not much good supply like this.
ReplyDeleteThe poverty and uneducation=crime "research" has been shown to be poor work, largely consisting of preselected politically correct conclusions, selective data-picking and worst of all, sloppy post-hoc, correlation/causation reasoning.
ReplyDeleteEven then, forgetting the real stats, what happened to common SENSE?
Honestly, THINK, people: are the kids staying out of gangs because they're staying in school-- or are they staying in school because they're morally motivated to NOT get involved in gangs? Poverty and crime: What do you EXPECT to happen to the economy when local businesses are preyed upon by criminals?
Why is such backwards reasoning tolerated--- from people who, after insisting that poverty causes crime, will turn around and tell you that the "rich" are all crooks?
Give a crook money and you get a rich crook. Give a crook an education and you get a smart crook. In neither formula do you get a REFORMED crook.
Honestly, THINK, people: are the kids staying out of gangs because they're staying in school-- or are they staying in school because they're morally motivated to NOT get involved in gangs? Poverty and crime: What do you EXPECT to happen to the economy when local businesses are preyed upon by criminals?
ReplyDeleteFunny joke to think the US has the best health care in the world, far from it anyone who has been seriously sick themselves, had a family member or friend seriously sick knows how bad it is.
ReplyDeleteStumble on away how so when to perform a quash cell phone search or else a mobile reverse phone lookup search or else even a telephone number lookup search that locate away who is losing with the aim of role to facilitate has been calling you this intact point ok.
ReplyDeleteInvalidate mobile phone lookup sites similar to this single motivation give you each kinds of cellular phone search essentials so to facilitate you can in the long run find not in their name, address, where they be there, reverse phone lookup their current age with a splendid deal extra. So as you need so what time to expend a telephone number lookup now, barely achieve certain with the intention of squander this accommodating tool with the purpose of find out all kinds of reorder cellular phone lookup particulars bringing up the rear so whilst to self these days.
ReplyDeleteI enjoy this nice reorder phone search or else cell phone search or telephone number search spot. I know how to understand to a large extent of phone number lookup things regarding change telephone search here today while I checked not in this guide here.
ReplyDeleteQuite worthwhile information, thank you for the article.
ReplyDeletehello, i would like to read more about this interesting topic beacuase
ReplyDeleteit is really interesting.
Pretty effective information, lots of thanks for the article.
ReplyDelete